THE EDITORIAL REPORT

A reading that turns your manuscript into decisions.

Autores.ai analyzes the text, explains what works, locates what needs revision, and organizes the next step. It does not deliver scattered comments: it delivers a navigable editorial diagnosis.

What you receive

Three connected layers to understand the text, decide what to revise, and move forward methodically.

01
Understand the text

Editorial verdict, overall score, dimension radar, strengths, and a reading of the whole.

02
Know what to revise

Prioritized findings with located evidence, impact, action, and completion criteria.

03
Move forward methodically

Revision plan, ordered tasks, dashboard, downloadable PDF, and—on subscription—Nobel conversations.

Inside the report

The structure changes with the document type while retaining a consistent editorial core.

Verdict and score

A synthesis of the text’s editorial condition and an explained—not isolated—score.

Editorial radar

A comparative view of the dimensions relevant to that genre and document type.

Strengths

Elements already supporting the work that should be preserved through revision.

!
Priorities

Problems ordered by importance to prevent scattered or cosmetic revision.

Located evidence

Passages from the text that let you verify why each observation was made.

Revision actions

What to change, why it matters, and how to know when the task is complete.

AUTORES.AI · REPORT
Editorial report
68/100
Editorial radar
Revision priority
Structure · 59

The thesis competes with two secondary lines and loses force in the middle section.

Next action

Define one thesis and reorganize the article into five movements before polishing the style.

Located evidence

The passage introduces a new promise while the reader is still waiting for the main thesis to be demonstrated…

Product, not promise

The same rigor, a different standard for each text.

Before scoring, Autores.ai identifies the document type and suggests a genre when the author has not declared one. An argumentative article is not measured like a novel; fiction, narrative nonfiction, and articles receive methodologies and dimensions suited to their purpose. The score does not reward only advanced texts. A weak manuscript can receive a low assessment and, precisely because of that, clearer criticism, evidence, and a useful starting point.

How it helps at each stage

A
First diagnosis

Discover the distance between the text’s intention and what actually reaches the reader.

B
Revision in progress

Order decisions, preserve strengths, and focus effort where it will have the greatest impact.

C
New draft

Compare the new diagnosis with earlier work and continue the editorial conversation with Nobel.

Contextual assistant

The report does not end when it is downloaded.

With the monthly subscription, Nobel turns the diagnosis into a conversation. Ask it to explain a priority, connect findings, help order a revision, or prepare a portable conversation brief. Nobel works with the report and, while you authorize it, the temporarily retained manuscript.

Meet Nobel
Portrait of Nobel
Nobel
Editorial reader
Online
What should I fix first?
Structure is the priority: 59/100. Three passages divert the thesis into secondary ideas. Define one central promise and reorder those blocks first; work on style afterward.

What a reliable report means

Every criticism must be tied to textual evidence and an understandable action. The system checks coverage, traceability, and consistency before publishing the result. These controls assess the reliability of the report, not the quality of the work: a troubled text can and should receive a low score and useful feedback. Autores.ai uses artificial intelligence, and its results may contain errors or omissions. The report is a tool for editorial judgment, not a certification or a substitute for the author’s creative decision.
YOUR NEXT DRAFT

You do not need more opinions. You need direction.

Upload your text and receive a diagnosis you can turn into concrete editorial work.